“Highest Sentence for Deadly Hit-and-Run”
In a recent hit-and-run case in Burnaby, B.C., the Crown prosecutor raised concerns about the “strategic incentive” for impaired drivers to flee the scene of collisions involving injury or death. The case involved Marcel Genaille, who rear-ended a motorcyclist in a fatal collision before abandoning his vehicle and fleeing the scene.
The Consequences of Fleeing
According to Crown prosecutor Mark Myhre, by leaving the scene of the crash, Genaille prevented society from uncovering the true cause of the collision. This lack of information is a significant issue as it hinders the justice system from holding individuals accountable for their actions. Myhre emphasized the need for a substantial penalty to deter individuals from fleeing the scene and potentially escaping accountability.
Discrepancy in Sentencing
One of the key points raised during the sentencing hearing was the discrepancy in sentencing between leaving the scene of an accident and impaired driving. While the maximum sentence for both offenses in cases involving death is life in prison, the actual sentencing range for hit-and-run cases is lower than that of impaired driving. This incongruity raises questions about the effectiveness of deterring individuals from fleeing the scene.
Different Perspectives
Criminal lawyer Kyla Lee also highlighted the complexities of hit-and-run cases, noting that individuals may flee the scene out of panic or uncertainty about what to do after an accident. She emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances of each case when determining an appropriate sentence.
Conclusion
The case of Marcel Genaille sheds light on the challenges and complexities of hit-and-run incidents involving injury or death. As discussions continue about the sentencing guidelines for such cases, it is essential to consider the different perspectives and factors that may influence an individual’s decision to flee the scene. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure justice is served and accountability is upheld in cases of serious collisions.”
Reference
