Parks Canada allocates $12 million budget for Sidney Island deer culling

53
Parks Canada to spend $12M on Sidney Island deer kill



“Deer eradication on Sidney Island: A $12 million controversy”

In a shocking revelation, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation uncovered documents detailing Parks Canada’s plan to spend a whopping $12 million on killing invasive deer and restoring native vegetation on Sidney Island. This cost is more than double what was originally reported, sparking outrage and criticism from various stakeholders.

The Costly Plan Unveiled

The forecasted spending of $11.988 million over eight years includes salaries, benefits, studies, Indigenous participation, miscellaneous expenses, and deer-eradication services. The initial phase of the deer-kill plan involved sharpshooters from the U.S. and New Zealand, resulting in the kill of only 84 deer, raising questions about the accuracy of the deer population estimate on the island.

Critics versus Supporters

While some argue that the mass roundups and kills by hunting groups have already reduced the fallow-deer population significantly, others question the need for such an expensive and controversial eradication program. Local hunters who have been managing the deer for free have proven to be more efficient in their culling efforts, killing 54 fallow deer at no cost to taxpayers.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s call for a halt to the deer-eradication program is gaining momentum as Parks Canada prepares for a second phase in the fall and winter, potentially involving ground-based marksmen and temporary fencing. The division among property owners on Sidney Island reflects the wider debate on the necessity and effectiveness of such a costly and contentious initiative.

Conclusion: A Question of Priorities

As the debate rages on, it raises important questions about the use of taxpayer dollars, wildlife management strategies, and the balance between conservation efforts and community involvement. While Parks Canada aims to restore native vegetation and protect the ecosystem on Sidney Island, the means and costs of achieving this goal remain a source of contention. Perhaps a reevaluation of the approach, consideration of alternative solutions, and more transparent communication with stakeholders could lead to a more effective and sustainable outcome for all involved.”



Reference

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here