Understanding the Skibicki trial: Exploring the ‘not criminally responsible’ defence

Skibicki trial: What is a 'not criminally responsible' defence?

“Accused killer Jeremy Skibicki faces an uphill battle in convincing a judge that he is not criminally responsible for the deaths of four Indigenous women. As the trial unfolds, legal analysts emphasize the complexity of proving such a defense in a court of law.

**The Challenging Defense**

Skibicki, 37, has admitted to killing the women in Winnipeg but contends that he is not criminally responsible due to a mental disorder. However, Toronto-based lawyer Robert Karrass points out that proving this defense requires substantial evidence of a history of mental disorder impacting the individual’s ability to know right from wrong.

**The Battle of Experts**

In cases like this, the accused typically undergo a forensic psychiatric assessment to evaluate their mental state. This process often involves a clash of opinions between the defense and the crown prosecutor’s selected experts, adding significant delays to the trial.

As the trial transitions to a judge-alone format, the focus shifts to understanding the motives behind the killings rather than just establishing the act itself. Skibicki’s admission to killing the women, including the Indigenous Mashkode Bizhiki’ikwe or Buffalo Woman, raises grave concerns about justice and accountability.

**The Verdict**

If the judge rules against the defense and finds Skibicki criminally responsible, he will face conviction for murder. However, if he is deemed not criminally responsible, a review board will determine his fate, prioritizing public safety over the individual’s freedom.

As the case continues to unfold in a Winnipeg courtroom, the decision rests on a delicate balance between justice, mental health, and public safety. Skibicki’s fate hangs in the balance, leaving a lingering question of accountability in the aftermath of these tragic events.”



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here