“Breaking up is hard enough, but what happens when a furry family member is caught in the middle? In a groundbreaking decision, a judge in British Columbia has granted joint custody of a dog to a former couple who couldn’t agree on ownership.
The Golden Retriever named Stella was at the center of a dispute between Sahar Bayat and Omid Mavedati. Bayat wanted exclusive custody, but Mavedati’s name was the only one on Stella’s birth certificate. However, evidence showed that both parties had a strong bond with Stella and cared deeply for her well-being.
The judge, Scott Nielsen, ultimately decided on a 50/50 split, with Stella spending one week with each owner on a rotating basis. This ruling is significant as it comes on the heels of changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia, recognizing pets as more than just property.
Shared custody for pets is becoming increasingly common, with experts like animal law lawyer Rebeka Breder advocating for what’s in the best interest of the animal. Just as parents have the right to fight for their children, pet owners should have the same opportunity to determine the care of their beloved companions.
When it comes to pet custody battles, the court now considers factors like the level of care provided, any history of cruelty, and the relationship with children. While going to the Supreme Court is an option, Breder suggests starting in small claims court for a quicker resolution.
In the end, the well-being of the pet should be the top priority in these cases. As pets are considered part of the family, it’s crucial to put their needs first, even in the midst of a breakup.
So next time a relationship ends, remember to consider the feelings of your furry friend and strive for a solution that keeps their best interests at heart.”
Reference
