Maxime Bernier found in violation of Saskatchewan public health order at COVID-era ‘freedom rally’

Maxime Bernier guilty of violating Sask. public health order for COVID-era 'freedom rally'

“Maxime Bernier Found Guilty of Violating Saskatchewan Public Health Order”

In a controversial ruling that has sparked heated debate, People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier has been found guilty of violating a Saskatchewan public health order. The judgment, released this month, stems from a rally held in Saskatoon as part of his “Mad Max Saskatchewan Tour” during a time when COVID-19 restrictions limited public gatherings to a maximum of ten people. With over 40 attendees issued fines after the rally, the trial had to be conducted at an event centre to accommodate its size.

The Court Ruling: Guilty vs. Not Guilty

In the midst of this high-profile trial, a provincial court judge, Quentin Douglas Agnew, carefully considered a wide range of arguments and evidence. In a written decision spanning 38 pages, Agnew announced that all but seven defendants were found guilty of violating the public health order. However, the judge couldn’t prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the seven individuals identified as not guilty were present at the rally.

Maxime Bernier’s Unwavering Stance

During the trial in September 2022, Maxime Bernier remained vocal and unwavering about his attendance at the rally. He openly expressed his pride in standing with the attendees, emphasizing that they were “extraordinary Canadians.” Despite the ruling against him, Bernier’s steadfastness in his beliefs and actions has left many questioning the fairness and impact of the court’s decision.

Unpacking the Legal Claims

A notable aspect of the judgment is the inclusion of “pseudo-legal claims” made by the defendants’ counsel. Agnew criticized these claims, including the assertion that the trial was operating as an “administrative tribunal,” as “shockingly erroneous.” This raises further questions about the legal defense presented and the legitimacy of the trial processes.

The Controversial Penalties

Despite the guilty verdict, Agnew did not specify the penalties for the defendants. In Saskatchewan, violating public health orders carries a maximum fine of $7,500 for individuals. It remains to be seen how this ruling and its potential repercussions will affect not only those found guilty but also the wider public’s perception of the justice system in addressing public health violations.

A Compelling Argument

The judgment against Maxime Bernier and other rally attendees has ignited discussions about the balance between public health measures and individual freedoms. While it’s crucial to uphold public safety, the verdict has prompted reflection on the fairness and proportionality of the penalties imposed. As the debate rages on, this ruling serves as a poignant example of the tensions between personal liberties and societal obligations, leaving us with a critical question: where should the line be drawn in balancing these conflicting interests?



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here