Follow
“Canadian Branded as a Spy after Accusing Country of Deception”
Two sources reveal that Michael Spavor, one of the two Canadians imprisoned by China for close to three years allegedly seeks a multimillion-dollar settlement from Ottawa. The allegations include his contention that he was inadvertently a spy for Canada and allied intelligence agencies, leading to his detention. However, misconception in the article assertions is crucial to the greater context of these events. One source argues that Spavor unwittingly provided intelligence on North Korea to Kovrig and later accused his fellow Canadian of deliberately disclosing the information, resulting in their arrest by Chinese authorities. These claims have ignited a fresh discourse surrounding the lengthy imprisonment of both Spavor and Kovrig and the nature of Mr. Kovrig’s duties in China.
Spy Allegation and Subsequent Diplomatic Relations Shake-up
China detained Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig in December 2018 with allegations of spying on the heels of Canada’s move to detain Huawei chief CFO Meng Wanzhou on a U.S. extradition warrant. Mr. Trudeau, along with cabinet officials and Canada’s then-ambassador to China, Dominic Barton, refuted claims that the Canadians were engaged in espionage. They maintained that their detention was arbitrary, driven by trumped-up charges, and perceived as retaliation for Meng’s arrest.
Negotiations and the Proposal for Settlement
Adamant negotiations between Toronto lawyer John K. Phillips and Patrick Hill, executive director and senior counsel at the federal Department of Justice and Global Affairs Canada, are under way. The Globe and Mail does not disclose the identities of the sources, stressing that they were not authorized to publicly discuss the subject. Spavor alleges that he was detained by Chinese authorities based on information shared with Kovrig, not actively participating in espionage. He was charged by Chinese prosecutors with spying for a foreign entity and illegally obtaining state secrets.
Evaluating Perspectives on the Matter
Amidst these controversial allegations, the government official denied that Spavor’s arrest was due to Mr. Kovrig’s conversations with Canadian authorities about his relationship with Mr. Spavor. Nevertheless, it is crucial to remember that China subjected Mr. Spavor to prolonged and brutal interrogation sessions, drugging, as well as threats of execution, during his 1,020 days behind bars. Despite the potential ramifications of his ordeal, Spavor’s lawyer declined to comment further based on no instructions from his client.
The subsequent conclusion to settle the scores would undoubtedly have a significant bearing on how international diplomacy between China and Canada unfolds in the future. This so-called “deception” would catalyze a formidable push-and-pull between the so-called “Five Eyes” alongside the government officials in both Canada and China. There has never been an opportune time for transparency and cooperation between nations to be paramount than right now. Whether it be mere bait to normalize foreign relations or a plea for accountability, the intended settlement, at its very crux, highlights the significance of the cross-border connections and the indispensable nature of peace and mutual understanding.
Reference
