Follow
“Surfer Denied Canadian Citizenship – Should the Government Intervene in Sports?”
VANCOUVER — Should the Canadian government step in and grant surfer Erin Brooks citizenship? Member of Parliament Jenny Kwan, the NDP critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, certainly seems to think so. She has requested Minister Marc Miller’s assistance in enabling Brooks to compete for Canada in next summer’s Olympic Games.
The Dilemma
Brooks, a 16-year-old surfer, was born in Texas and raised in Hawaii. Her Canadian connections are through her American-born father, Jeff, who holds dual American-Canadian citizenship, and her grandfather who was born in Montreal. However, her recent bid for Canadian citizenship was denied, rendering her ineligible to compete for Canada at the Pan American Games and defend her world junior title in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Brooks’ impressive track record includes winning a silver medal at this year’s World Surfing Games and securing the title of world junior women’s champion. Despite her talents and achievements, the denial of her citizenship application has cast a shadow over her surfing career and potential opportunities to showcase her skills on an international stage.
Involvement of the Federal Government
However, opposition from the Conservative party in Ottawa has complicated matters, with allegations of stalling an amendment to the Citizenship Act that would restore citizenship rights for the second-generation born abroad. Bill C-37 in 2009 curtailed those rights and, as a result, the eligibility of individuals like Erin Brooks to access Canadian citizenship.
In the Eye of the Beholder
The question of whether the federal government should intervene in this case particularly divides public opinion. Some argue that as a promising young athlete, Brooks should be granted the opportunity to represent Canada at the Olympics – an experience that embodies the spirit of unity, sportsmanship, and global cooperation. Furthermore, considering her familial ties to Canada, the argument for granting her citizenship becomes even more compelling.
On the other side of the spectrum, there are concerns regarding the precedence and fairness of using political influence to expedite citizenship for a specific individual. With countless others navigating the complex system of immigration and citizenship, the prioritization of Brooks’ case could be seen as unjust when considering the struggle and plight of many others in similar situations.
Dilemma vs. Principle
Ultimately, this situation highlights a conflict between two fundamental principles. On one hand, the importance of fairness and equality within a citizenship framework is vital to preserving the integrity of the system. Conversely, the significance of supporting and nurturing talent in an athletic context, particularly in the lead-up to an international event as grand as the Olympics, underscores the value of harnessing exceptional skills and providing a platform to exhibit them.
The resolution to this dilemma demands a delicate balance of these two considerations. Whether the Canadian government should step in to facilitate Brooks’ citizenship application remains a contentious and nuanced debate. But one thing is clear – this case underscores the complexity and multifaceted nature of immigration, citizenship, and the significant role these factors can play in the realm of sports.”
Reference
