Taxpayers in Winnipeg face $316K cost to rename streets linked to Bishop Grandin

170
Winnipeg taxpayers to foot $316K bill to rename streets associated with Bishop Grandin



“Is Political Correctness Going Too Far? Winnipeg Plans to Rename Two Streets”

Winnipeg is spending a hefty sum of over $316,000 in taxpayer funds to rename two streets, Bishop Grandin Boulevard and Grandin Street, in an effort to distance itself from historical figures considered controversial by progressives.

Renaming Pioneer Street Names

The decision to change the names stems from actions taken by other cities, such as Toronto’s move to rename Dundas St. The Indigenous Naming Circle recommended the name changes following consultations with Indigenous communities. The new names will be Abinojii Mikanah and Taapweewin Way.

Winnipeg’s city council received the recommendations from the Standing Policy Committee on Property and Development and the Riel Community Committee and approved budget increases for the renaming project.

But the allocated funds won’t be limited to street signs and documents. Compensating business owners affected by the changes might amount to approximately $100,000 for Bishop Grandin Boulevard.

Questions Arising from the Politically Correct Trend

Critics have argued that activists are attempting to rewrite history about Bishop Grandin. He has been depicted as inclusive of Indigenous people and devoted to religious and missionary work among the aboriginals in Western Canada during the 1800s.

Among other criticisms, the move raises concerns about the financial burden on taxpayers and how the renaming of streets will impact city infrastructure.

Toronto has faced similar concerns after deciding to rename Dundas St. due to its alleged historical ties to the global slave trade. The move has sparked debates on whether the origins of street names should be re-examined.

However, the call to rename Dundas St. in Toronto has raised concerns about its potential impact on the city’s transit system and infrastructure. Renaming a major street like Dundas St. will require replacing maps in 4,000 bus shelters, 75 subway stations, and on board all streetcars and subway train cars.

Conclusion

While the decision to rename controversial street names is a step towards inclusivity and Indigenous recognition, it stirs debates over the potential costs and inconveniences faced by the city and its residents. Whether such actions lead to a positive or negative impact on the community is a matter of perspective and raises questions about striking a balance between historical recognition and modern sensitivities.”



Reference

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here