Jury starts deliberating in Nathaniel Veltman trial for attack on Muslim family

Accused in killing of London, Ont., Muslim family details dark web use, descent into paranoia


E-mail : *

“BREAKING: Jurors start deliberations in trial of Nathaniel Veltman, accused in fatal London, Ont., Muslim family truck attack”

After weeks of testimony, including from accused killer Nathaniel Veltman, the trial has entered its final and most crucial phase. Now, it’s up to the jurors to determine the fate of the 22-year-old accused in the tragic June 6, 2021, fatal truck attack on a Muslim family in London, Ont. The accused, who has pleaded not guilty to four counts of murder, one count of attempted murder, and associated terror charges, took the witness box in his own defense during trial proceedings that began on September 11, 2022, in Ontario Superior Court in Windsor. This high-profile trial, moved to Windsor due to intense media coverage in London, has gripped the nation, bringing with it many emotions and deep-seated questions about justice and accountability.

The Heartbreaking Attack

The tragic incident that shook the nation occurred when high school student Yumnah Afzaal, 15, her parents Madiha Salman, 44, and Salman Afzaal, 46, and family matriarch Talat Afzaal, 74, were killed while out for an evening walk. A nine-year-old boy was also seriously injured but miraculously survived this senseless act of violence.

“Revealing Testimonies”

The trial has seen several witnesses, including police officers involved in the arrest, a cab driver who interacted with Veltman in the mall parking lot, and a forensic psychiatrist who provided insights into the accused’s mental state during the attack. The conflicting perspectives, intense debates and emotionally charged testimonies have raised questions about the motives behind the attack and the role of mental illness in perpetrating such heinous crimes.

The Two Sides of the Coin

The accused’s defense has raised compelling points about his troubled upbringing and declining mental health prior to the attack. On the other hand, the prosecution has argued that the attack stemmed from the accused’s far-right ideology, citing his online “research” and the manifesto he expressed, which displayed prejudice against immigrants and multiculturalism. With these conflicting narratives, the jurors now have the grave responsibility of sifting through the complexities of this case to deliver a fair and just verdict.

The banners of justice and accountability have been raised high as the jurors engage in deep contemplation and deliberations to provide solace and closure to the grieving family and the entire community affected by this devastating event.

In a time where unity and understanding should triumph over hate and violence, the outcome of this trial holds the significant power to shape our societal response to such atrocities. The eyes of the world are fixed on the deliberations, awaiting the fulfillment of justice that is not only fair and impartial but also deeply humane.


Leave a Reply