Prince George, B.C.’s encampment eviction deemed a ‘serious human rights violation’ by federal housing advocate – Read more

81
Encampment eviction in Prince George, B.C., was a 'serious human rights violation': federal housing advocate



“Federal Housing Advocate Condemns Eviction as Serious Human Rights Violation in Prince George”

In a shocking development, Canada’s federal housing advocate has labeled the eviction of over 30 residents from an encampment in Prince George, B.C., as a “serious human rights violation.” Marie-Josée Houle, in an interview with CBC News, criticized the city for failing to provide safe and adequate housing alternatives for the displaced individuals before permanently displacing them. The Office of the Federal Housing Advocate expressed further concerns about residents potentially losing important survival equipment and personal belongings during the eviction process.

Worst Practices in Municipal Approaches

Houle went on to describe the decision made by Prince George city council and staff as one of the worst practices observed by her office in dealing with encampments. This alarming assessment highlights the dire situation faced by many individuals who find themselves living in encampments across the country. It also raises questions about the effectiveness and compassion of governmental responses to homelessness.

Lack of Safe and Adequate Alternatives

The City of Prince George demolished the Millennium Park encampment on September 11th, just 11 days after serving eviction notices to the residents. The city claimed that the encampment had deteriorated and posed safety risks to both residents and first responders. However, critics argue that forcibly removing individuals without ensuring they have safe and adequate alternatives is inhumane and goes against their rights.

Less Punitive Approaches in Other Cities

Houle pointed to several municipalities, such as Hamilton, Halifax, and Saskatoon, that have adopted a less punitive approach to encampments. These cities prioritize finding long-term solutions to homelessness rather than resorting to evictions and demolitions. By providing support systems and pathways to stable housing, these cities offer a more compassionate approach that prioritizes the well-being of their residents.

The Cycle of Displacement

This is not the first time Prince George has faced criticism for its handling of encampments. In 2021, parts of another encampment named Moccasin Flats were demolished by the city, despite failing to obtain an injunction from the B.C. Supreme Court. Community members and organizers, like Amelia Merrick, express their disappointment with the city’s resistance to learning from past mistakes. They believe that these actions perpetuate a cycle of displacement and enact further violence upon vulnerable populations.

An Urgent Need for Change

The concerns raised by the federal housing advocate emphasize the urgent need for a human rights-based framework when addressing homelessness and encampments. The Office of the Federal Housing Advocate aims to advance the right to housing for all Canadians through such an approach. By viewing encampments as a symptom of a broken housing system, rather than a problem to be eradicated, communities can develop more effective and compassionate solutions to address homelessness.

The Choice of Last Resort

Living in encampments is often a choice of last resort for individuals with limited options. While they may face safety risks within these encampments, other alternatives, such as shelters or dangerous living situations, can present even greater threats to their well-being. Displacing individuals from encampments without providing viable and secure housing options can force them back into unsafe relationships, criminal activities, and isolation from essential support networks.

The Ongoing Struggle

Amelia Merrick highlights the ongoing struggle faced by residents of Moccasin Flats, the suggested alternative site for those displaced from Millennium Park. Basic necessities like running water, electricity, and safe sources of heat are still lacking in this new location. The continued neglect and lack of adequate services only exacerbate the challenges faced by these individuals, deepening the cycle of homelessness.

In Conclusion

The eviction of residents from the encampment in Prince George raises broader questions about the treatment of homelessness and the rights of vulnerable individuals. It is crucial that cities approach this issue with empathy, compassion, and an understanding of the underlying root causes. By providing safe and adequate alternatives, we can break the cycle of displacement and truly uplift those in need. The time for change is now.



Reference

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here